🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."